Genesis 14:14-16

New English Translation

Footnotes

1. Genesis 14:14 tn Heb “his brother,” by extension, “relative.” Here and in v. 16 the more specific term “nephew” has been used in the translation for clarity. Lot was the son of Haran, Abram’s brother (Gen 11:27).
2. Genesis 14:14 tn The verb וַיָּרֶק (vayyareq) is a rare form, probably related to the word רֵיק (req, “to be empty”). If so, it would be a very figurative use: “he emptied out” (or perhaps “unsheathed”) his men. The LXX has “mustered” (cf. NEB). E. A. Speiser (Genesis [AB], 103-4) suggests reading with Smr a verb diq, cognate with Akkadian deku, “to mobilize” troops. If this view is accepted, one must assume that a confusion of the Hebrew letters ד (dalet) and ר (resh) led to the error in the traditional Hebrew text. These two letters are easily confused in all phases of ancient Hebrew script development. The present translation is based on this view.
3. Genesis 14:14 tn The words “the invaders” have been supplied in the translation for clarification.
4. Genesis 14:14 sn The use of the name Dan reflects a later perspective. The Danites did not migrate to this northern territory until centuries later (see Judg 18:29). Furthermore Dan was not even born until much later. By inserting this name a scribe has clarified the location of the region.
5. Genesis 14:15 tn The Hebrew text simply has “night” as an adverbial accusative.
6. Genesis 14:15 tn Heb “he”; the referent (Abram) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
7. Genesis 14:15 tn Heb “he divided himself…he and his servants.”
8. Genesis 14:15 tn Heb “left.” Directions in ancient Israel were given in relation to the east rather than the north.
9. Genesis 14:16 tn The word “stolen” is supplied in the translation for clarification.
10. Genesis 14:16 tn The phrase “the rest of “ has been supplied in the translation for clarification.